« WA Gov: Logan Presenting Report to King Council, LIVE | Main | Correction Required on WaGov Analysis »

February 14, 2005



The story lost a little zest when they found the right picture, no?


Did they? I just picked it up at Billmon and went with it. If it's a bogus trail, then I'll take it down.


Yeah, the last update is that they published a third picture that was Iran, or the one they used was Iran--anyway, they supplied a different picture. It doesn't solve how or why they used two different aspects of the same picture for both articles at first, but there's an explanation now, at least.

Far be it from me to complain about journalistic errors. :(


That was great torrid.

"Far be it from me to complain about journalistic errors. :("


I'll agree it's probably an honest mistake and not so Orwellian, but since I found the Aussie Dr. to add to the post, I'm going leave this up unless, TJ, you think too much journalistic error is bad for appearances?Billmon, who is my linkage source, has the third picture up, and spicey 1984 words.


I think Billmon jumped the gun a bit, but he did the right thing and updated his story as necessary. You, my right-blogging friend, are fine.

The comments to this entry are closed.

April 2006

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29


Blog powered by Typepad